<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Indeed™ &#187; yes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisisnotapalindrome.com/tag/yes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisisnotapalindrome.com</link>
	<description>What is this? It's certainly not a palindrome. Oh... indeed.™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:51:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Domesticated Peeve</title>
		<link>http://thisisnotapalindrome.com/2009/02/03/a-domesticated-peeve/</link>
		<comments>http://thisisnotapalindrome.com/2009/02/03/a-domesticated-peeve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ScottSpork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthrax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asking a question negatively]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[correct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incorrect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet peeve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atdotdot.com/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I present to you, dear reader, a domesticated (or pet) peeve of mine: the proper way to address a question asked in the negative voice. When presented with a query asked in the negative (e.g. &#8220;You didn&#8217;t just drop that vial of Antrhax?&#8221;) the answers &#8220;Yes&#8221; or &#8220;No&#8221; are insufficient. Allow me to elaborate. Let [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I present to you, dear reader, a domesticated (or pet) peeve of mine: the proper way to address a question asked in the negative voice. When presented with a query asked in the negative (e.g. &#8220;You didn&#8217;t just drop that vial of Antrhax?&#8221;) the answers &#8220;Yes&#8221; or &#8220;No&#8221; are insufficient.</p>
<p>Allow me to elaborate.</p>
<p>Let us take that example question and use it in a faux conversation.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Bewildered Scientist:</em> You didn&#8217;t just drop that vial of Anthrax?</p>
<p><em>Clumsy Scientist:</em> Yes.</p>
<p><em>Bewildered Scientist:</em> Do you mean &#8220;Yes, I did drop it&#8221; or &#8220;Yes, I didn&#8217;t drop it&#8221;?</p>
<p><em>Clumsy Scientist:</em> What do you think I meant?</p>
<p><em>Bewildered Scientist:</em> Dammit James, answer the question! We could have a biological pathogen on the loose!</p>
<p><em>Apparently James:</em> I did answer you fool! You haven&#8217;t activated emergency protocol A11-CCX?</p>
<p><em>Bewildered Scientist: </em>What? No!</p>
<p><em>Apparently James:</em> Do you mean &#8220;No, I didn&#8217;t activate it&#8221; or &#8220;No, I did activate it&#8221;?</p>
<p><em>At this point both scientists suffer a massive brain embolism completely unrelated to the unbroken vial of anthrax.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I believe my point is well illustrated. Now, allow me to present you with the correct way of answering a question asked in the negative.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Bewildered Scientist:</em> You didn&#8217;t just drop that vial of Anthrax?</p>
<p><em>Clumsy Scientist:</em> Correct, I didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p><em>Bewildered Scientist:</em> Oh, OK then. So how does Chili&#8217;s sound for lunch?</p>
<p><em>Clumsy Scientist:</em> Oh, no can do. Margaret and I are going to the wedding planners to look at cake designs.</p>
<p><em>Bewildered Scientist:</em> Oh, OK. Some other time then?</p>
<p><em>Apparently Margaret&#8217;s Betrothed:</em> Sounds great.</p>
<p><em>Bewildered Scientist: </em>Say, why are we handling potentially dangerous vials of Anthrax anyway?</p>
<p><em>Apparently Margaret&#8217;s Betrothed</em><em>:</em> We aren&#8217;t. We work at a book store.</p>
<p><em>At this point both scientists turn around and go back to restocking the shelves with pulp sci-fi novels, silently pondering how little use their PhDs in astrophysics and bio-engineering actually are.<br />
</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Now you can clearly see exactly how to deal with a question asked in the negative. Either reply with &#8220;Correct&#8221; or &#8220;Incorrect&#8221; as the situation depends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thisisnotapalindrome.com/2009/02/03/a-domesticated-peeve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

